LLM Login

In order to view all of the resources available on LLM, PLEASE Log-In.
Not a member of LLM?
Please take a moment and register here
Member of LLM? Log-in
 

Question!

Are we to exalt the teachings of Jesus during His earthly ministry above those of the RISEN Jesus through the Apostle Paul? Yes or No?

 

Birthdays!

  • LindaJSmith LindaJSmith Send PM
    birthday is today!
  • angelhelper angelhelper Send PM
    birthday is today!
  • requalizer requalizer Send PM
    birthday is today!
 

Word Today

There ARE Dispensations in the Bible!
Read More
 
Salvation, pt.4: FEELING
Read More
 
Salvation, pt.3: FRUIT
Read More
 
Salvation, pt.2: FAITH
Read More
 
Salvation, pt.1: FACT
Read More
 
A Quick Word For the New Year, 2014...From The Lion and Lamb Ministry
Read More
 
What Does...Jesus Christ the Same Yesterday, Today, and Forever...Mean?
Read More
 
Is the Last Trump of 1 Corinthians 15:51-52 the Same as the Seventh Trump of Revelation 11:15?
Read More
 
What is The Mystery of the Dispensation of The Mystery? Ephesians 3:9-11
Read More
 
Are We To Follow Jesus (while on earth), OR, The Apostle Paul?
Read More
 
Religion and Biblical Christianity
Read More
 
Enos: Then Began Men To Call Upon The Name Of The LORD
Read More
 
The Five Groups Addressed from Matthew to Revelation
Read More
 
Judging and the Child of God: A Close Look at Matthew 7:1, part 3
Read More
 
Judging and the Child of God: A Close Look at Matthew 7:1, part 2
Read More
 
Judging and the Child of God: A Close Look at Matthew 7:1, part 1
Read More
 
Peter's Gospel and Paul's Gospel...The Difference, part 10
Read More
 
Peter's Gospel and Paul's Gospel...The Difference, part 9
Read More
 
Peter's Gospel and Paul's Gospel...The Difference, part 8
Read More
 
LLM BIBLE STUDY RULES Message Series Illustration Charts
Read More
 
Peter's Gospel and Paul's Gospel...The Difference, part 7
Read More
 
Peter's Gospel and Paul's Gospel...The Difference, part 6
Read More
 
Peter's Gospel and Paul's Gospel...The Difference, part 5
Read More
 
Peter's Gospel and Paul's Gospel...The Difference, part 4
Read More
 
Peter's Gospel and Paul's Gospel...The Difference, part 3
Read More
 
Peter's Gospel and Paul's Gospel...The Difference, part 2
Read More
 
Peter's Gospel and Paul's Gospel...The Difference, part 1
Read More
 
Are We Close to the End, part 3
Read More
 
Are We Close to the End, part 2
Read More
 
Leaving This World...What is Next?
Read More
 
Are We Close to the End, part 1
Read More
 
THIS IS THAT Which was Spoken, part 2
Read More
 
THIS IS THAT Which was Spoken, part 1
Read More
 
Try the spirits whether they are of God, part 2
Read More
 
Try the spirits whether they are of God, part 1
Read More
 
These Days are NOT These Days, part 2...Approve Things that are Excellent
Read More
 
These Days are NOT These Days, part 1
Read More
 
The Enlightening Unifying MYSTERY, Part 3...The Spirit of Revelation
Read More
 
Ambassadors for Christ...Here is Your Charge
Read More
 
The Enlightening Unifying MYSTERY, Part 2...Test the spirits
Read More
 

Mobile APP

Get the Android APP
Click Here Now
Get the Mobile APP
Click Here Now
 

World Info

 

SonShine

 

Rennis

 

Visitors

Praise The LORD!
mod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_counter
 

Content

LLM’s SIXTH BIBLE STUDY RULE: This is That PDF Print E-mail
PastorDavid

The Book of Acts covers a period of about thirty years; from the Christ, about 33 A.D., until after Paul’s arrival in Rome as the prisoner of Christ. Now, Jesus Christ, on earth, was a minister of the circumcision, meaning of Israel; sent ONLY to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. Romans 15:8 , Matthew 15:24 . Paul was the prisoner of Christ, FOR Gentiles. Ephesians 3:1 . He was the Apostle TO the Gentiles, sent TO them by Christ, with the Gospel of the Grace and Glory of the Blessed God! Galatians 1:11-13 , 1 Timothy 1:11 , 1 Timothy 2:7 , 2 Timothy 1:11 , Romans 11:13 .

Also, The Book of Acts is the...Book Between...the earthly ministry of the Son of God, which closed about 33 A. D., and those Epistles of the Apostle Paul, written AFTER he had reached Rome; those Epistles are: Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, 1 Timothy, Philemon, Titus, and 2 Timothy. Inasmuch as The Mystery is mentioned twelve times in those Epistles, we could refer to them as “The Mystery Epistles”. Ephesians, Philippians, and Colossians were written about 64 A.D. or about 31 years AFTER the Lord Jesus had gone back to heaven.

So, let us then study the Book of Acts AS the...Book Between...Matthew, Mark, and Luke, on the one side, AND, Ephesians, Philippians and Colossians, on the other side. It is interesting to note that the Book of Matthew has twenty-eight chapters; and that the Book of Acts has twenty eight chapters. That the Book of Matthew is decidedly Jewish, no student of the Word of God will deny; but many students of the Word of God will be surprised to know that the following words are found only 86 times in the Book of Matthew BUT 250 times in the Book of Acts. The words are: Jews, Jerusalem, Sabbath, Moses, Law, Temple, Synagogue, Israel. So, we have to ask, how Jewish, then, is the Book of Acts?

In the Gospel of Matthew, Mark, and Luke, the Son of God was on earth. He was born King of the Jews; He entered Jerusalem on the ass, as the King of Israel; He was crucified as King of the Jews. In Ephesians, Philippians and Colossians, the RISEN Son of God is seated in the Upper Heavenlies, as Head over all things to the Church of the Dispensation of Grace, which is His BODY, not Bride, BODY. Ephesians 1:19-22 . Now the question, if the Lord Jesus is the King of Israel in the first three Books, (Matthew, Mark, and Luke), and is the Head of the Body in the last three Books, (Ephesians, Philippians and Colossians), just WHICH of the two is He in the Book Between, the Book of Acts? Is He both?

That the Lord Jesus Christ, when an earth, offered to Israel a Kingdom WHICH WAS DIFFERENT from the Body of Christ described in Ephesians, Philippians and Colossians, no intelligent student of the Word of God will deny. The character of that Kingdom offered to Israel is described in the first chapter of Luke. Christ, was born to take the throne of David. Luke 1:28-33 . Christ was coming to deliver the Nation Israel. Luke 1:67-77 . In His offer to establish His Kingdom in the midst of Israel, Christ was fulfilling the Word which God had spoken by the mouth of all His holy prophets SINCE the world began. Luke 1:70 . Luke was also the human author of the Book Between, the Book of Acts. Therefore, is it not significant that in the Book of Acts, Christ was raised from the dead to take David’s throne? Acts 2:25-31 . Was there not also in the Book of Acts God’s offer to Israel, upon the condition of repentance, to establish the SAME Kingdom promised by all of the holy prophets SINCE the world began? Acts 3:21 . Note the language of Luke 1:70 and Acts 3:21 and you must conclude that the same Israelitish Kingdom is referred to in both Scriptures.

Let us note three verses in the first three Books referred to, (Matthew, Mark, and Luke),that is, one verse from Mark, one from Matthew and one from Luke; all concerning the Kingdom of God, or Kingdom of Heaven.

MARK 1:15 Christ said, “THE TIME IS FULFILLED”; “THE KINGDOM OF GOD IS AT HAND”.

MATTHEW 21:43 Christ said, “THE KINGDOM OF GOD SHALL BE TAKEN FROM YOU”.

LUKE 21:31 Christ said, “THE KINGDOM OF GOD WILL BE AT HAND”. (When the Son of man shall return in the clouds) Luke 21:27 .

The Kingdom was at hand; in fulfillment of the Scriptures. The Kingdom was taken away; in fulfillment of the Scriptures. Matthew 21:42 . The Kingdom of God WILL BE at hand; in fulfillment of the Scriptures. The Lord Jesus Christ went to the cross, died, and was raised the third day; all in fulfillment of the Scriptures. Luke 24:25 , and Luke 24:46 .

When Peter and the Eleven preached concerning the two great events, on the day of Pentecost, (which of course were the resurrection of Christ and the advent of the Holy Spirit), they said that both events were in fulfillment of the Scriptures; in fulfillment of prophecies that God had made concerning Israel’s Kingdom, by Joel and David. HOWEVER, neither of these prophets had ANY WORD about the “The Mystery” of Ephesians, Philippians and Colossians. But both of them, Joel and David, had much to say about the Kingdom of Acts which was the Kingdom of Matthew, Mark and Luke. So did Amos as seen in Acts 15:13-18 , and Amos 9:11-15 .

Concerning the advent of the Holy Spirit, on the day of Pentecost, Peter and the Eleven said, "by the prophet Joel” Acts 2:16 . We can know the character of Joel’s message, if we will read just one verse: Joel 2:18 . Joel referred to the same Kingdom of God that Christ announced to be “at hand”; the same kingdom that Christ said would be taken away from Israel, and that would be given back to Israel when the Son of man shall return to the Earth. Joel’s prophecy awaits complete fulfillment. But understand this...Joel had not one word to say about the Body of Christ. Neither did any one of the holy prophets, (who had spoken SINCE the world began), refer to the Body of Christ. Concerning the Body of Christ message of Ephesians, Philippians and Colossians, it could NOT be said, "this is that" which was spoken by Joel, Isaiah, Daniel, David, Ezekiel, Zechariah, Malachi, Jeremiah, Amos, Micah, or any other Old Testament prophet. We are so instructed of this fact in Ephesians 3:5-9 , and Colossians 1:24-27 . HOWEVER, all of them DID speak of the Kingdom of Matthew, Mark, and Luke, and of the same Kingdom referred to in Acts 3:19-21 . So now, read carefully Acts 3:24 concerning “these days”. You see, because, “These days” of Acts 3:19-25 DIFFER from “these days” of Ephesians 2:11-17 .

When the LORD Jesus Christ proclaimed His Kingdom in Mark 1:15 , “the Kingdom of God is at hand,” He said, “the time is fulfilled.” He could have well said, "This is That" which was spoken by the prophet Joel.” Joel 2:15-18 . He could have said, “this is that” which was spoken by Isaiah; in Isaiah 62:1-4 , or in Isaiah 35:3-6 . He could have said, “this is that” which was spoken by Zechariah, Daniel, David, Ezekiel, Jeremiah, Micah, Amos, and so on. When the Son of man shall return in power and great glory to restore again the Kingdom to Israel, He can and will say, “this is that” which was spoken by the mouth of all the holy prophets since the world began; for the same Kingdom that Christ proclaimed at hand shall THEN BE at hand. This includes the prophets to whom Peter referred in the Book of Acts: Joel, David, Amos, (Acts 15:14-18 ), Moses, Samuel and all the prophets (Acts 3:22-24 , and Acts 10:43 ).

It is of interest to note that there are about thirty five quotations from Israel’s Scriptures in the Book of Matthew, and about twenty five quotations from Israel’s Scriptures in the Book of Acts. The Old Testament prophecies are quoted in both Matthew and Acts. Surely they were Kingdom messages, and not messages referring to the Body of Christ, which was “The Mystery” not made known to the sons of men in other ages. Ephesians 3:5 . Colossians 1:25-26 . Ephesians 3:9 .

According to Matthew 4:17 , the Lord said, “the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand.” In Mark 1:15 , we read, “the Kingdom of God is at hand.” The Kingdom of Heaven of Matthew at hand, and the Kingdom of God of Mark and Luke, at hand, were identical. The Kingdom of Heaven, or the Kingdom of God, foretold by Israel’s prophets, was at hand, BECAUSE the King was at hand. Every where the Kingdom message was for the Nation Israel, the message was accompanied by Kingdom signs. When John the Baptist sent word to know if Christ was the One to come, the LORD sent word to John, that the healing miracles of Isaiah 35:4-5 were being performed by Him; therefore, He was Israel’s God, Messiah, and King, promised in Isaiah 35:1-4 . When the Lord Jesus sent forth His twelve apostles to preach saying, “the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand”, He said, “Heal the sick, cleanse the lepers, raise the dead...” Matthew 10:7-8 . They went preaching the Gospel and healing everywhere. Luke 9:6 . So we ask...What Gospel were they preaching? And the answer is...The Gospel of the Kingdom. Matthew 4:23 , Matthew 9:35 , Matthew 24:14 , and Mark 1:14 . Included in Christ's Kingdom program was not only the Kingdom signs, but the Kingdom parables, the Kingdom prayer, given TO the Kingdom Nation. The instructions of the Lord to His apostles were, “Go not into the way of the Gentiles; go to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” Matthew 10:5-6 , Matthew 15:24 . When the Lord shall come as the Son of man and establish His Kingdom on earth, the Twelve Apostles are to sit on twelve thrones and judge the Twelve Tribes of Israel. Matthew 19:28 . For some reason, God instructed the Twelve to limit their ministry to the circumcision, the Jews, even AFTER the conversion of Cornelius. as we see in Galatians 2:7-9 .

All Premillennialists are agreed that the Kingdom of God was offered to Israel; that the Kingdom of God was taken away from Israel; and that the Kingdom of God SHALL YET be given to Israel. They are agreed that while the Kingdom is in abeyance, and the Kingdom program is paused...the Body of Christ is being completed. They are agreed that, “All Israel shall be saved”. Romans 11:25-26 . They are agreed that the redeemed Nation shall yet have peaceful possession of their land under the reign of the true King David, in fulfillment of the Abrahamic, Davidic, and the New Covenants; because the gifts and calling of God are without repentance. Romans 11:25-31 .

HOWEVER, the Premillennialists are by NO MEANS agreed as to just WHEN the Kingdom of God was taken away from the Nation Israel. But they are agreed that the Body of Christ began historically after the death of Christ. Some say that the Kingdom of God was taken away from Israel, when the Lord Jesus pronounced that awful judgment upon that Nation, as recorded in Matthew 23:31-39 , “Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers”, “Your house is left unto you desolate”. Others say that the Kingdom offer was not withdrawn until after Stephen saw the Son of man STANDING at the right hand of God and Peter was sent to Cornelius: Acts 7:54-56 , and Acts 10:34-46 . Others say that the Kingdom of God was not taken from Israel until that Nation was set aside by the Lord after the words of rejection and judgment pronounced by the Apostle Paul, in Acts 28:25-28 .

It is because of this division of opinion that we ask the question...Is the Lord Jesus Christ, in the Book of Acts, in the “Book Between”, the King of Israel, OR is He, in that Book, the Head of the Church, which is His Body?

Of course, this is equivalent to asking, “Is the Church of God to which the three thousand were added on the day of Pentecost the same Church mentioned in Ephesians, the Body of Christ?” Or again this question, “Did the Church, which is His Body, begin historically on the day of Pentecost?” We know that we have no Scripture stating specifically that the Body of Christ did begin on the day of Pentecost; neither is there any Scripture stating that that Body did not begin on the day of Pentecost. We must study the scriptures diligently, under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, to answer these questions, rather than follow some man’s interpretation or accept the creeds of Historic Christianity. We seem to be agreed that Israel’s seventh day Sabbath is no longer binding on members of the Body of Christ. We learn that truth by the study of several Scriptures, in not one of which, however, is the definite statement made that the member of the Body of Christ should regard the FIRST day of the week, as a sanctified day, instead of the seventh ­day, which was given to Israel. SURELY Sabbath keeping, anointing with oil, signs and ceremonies, continued to be practiced by Israelitish believers during the Acts period; and then for some reason they ceased to be God’s order for the members of the Body of Christ. We should be able to give an intelligent Scriptural explanation for their cessation, in accordance with 2 Timothy 2:15 . We should be able to give an intelligent Scriptural explanation as to why the Body of Christ did or did not begin on the day of Pentecost. We should not believe it, simply because some leading Bible teacher has so declared. If it is not stated in any chapter of the Book of Acts that the RISEN Lord is the King of Israel and if it is not stated in that Book, that He is the Head of that Church which is His Body, how can we answer the question?

In Mark 16:14-18 we find recorded the instructions given to Peter and the other apostles by the RISEN Christ. They were to go preach the Gospel. “He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved.” Certain signs were to follow them that believe. The Eleven went out preaching the Gospel that was given to them AND “signs following.” Mark 16:20 . Kingdom signs continued. But, were they preaching the Gospel of the Glory of the blessed God, to which the Apostle Paul referred in 1 Timothy 1:11 ? In 1 Timothy 5:23 , the Apostle Paul told that faithful saint, Timothy, to take a physical remedy for his physical disease. Therefore, Kingdom signs were not following the Gospel message which Timothy was preaching. The signs of Mark 16:17-18 followed The Apostle Paul up to Acts 28:28 . The signs of Mark 16:17-18 are not following the preaching of the Gospel by ANYONE today. Neither should Pastors and Preachers adhering to the Gospel of Grace preach, “he that believeth AND is baptized shall be saved.” A radical change has taken place since the days of Mark 16:14-18 . Now, is the change only in the signs, OR, in the Message?

Should the Child of God today preach what Peter and the Eleven preached to Israel on the day of Pentecost, or even what Peter preached EIGHT YEARS LATER to Cornelius? NO! Should the messenger of the Gospel of the Grace of God be preaching, with the approval of God (that’s the key), “repent and be baptized FOR the remission of sins?” NO! Should Christian Pastors, and Preachers, be preaching to individual Gentiles today what Peter preached to the Nation Israel, in Acts 3:19-26 ? NO!

Peter preached to Israel and to Cornelius concerning Jesus of Nazareth IN the land of Israel. Acts 2:22 , and Acts 10:36-40 . Now, without a doubt, in all of these messages there was the element of Grace; BUT it was Israel’s Kingdom that was in view and saved Israelites continued with an Israelitish religious program throughout the “Acts” period. The “Book Between” is a book of signs, miracles and supernatural visitations. Should we, earnestly endeavor to recover, for the Body of Christ, the signs, ceremonies, and visions of the “Book Between”? God Forbid!

So we ask...Does the “Sign” program of the Book of Acts correspond with the “Sign” program of Matthew, Mark, and Luke, or with the “Sign LESS” message of Ephesians, Philippians and Colossians?

After God has accomplished His purpose in this Dispensation of Grace, the Dispensation of the Mystery, “to make of the twain One New Man” Ephesians 2:15 , the Son of man will return in the clouds in power and great glory, and THEN, FOR Israel, the Kingdom of God will be at hand. Luke 21:27-31 . THEN the Son of man will sit as a King on the throne of His glory. Matthew 25:31-35 . He will be Wonderful, the Mighty God, the Prince of Peace, on David’s throne. Isaiah 9:6-7 . However, NOW, in the meantime, Christ, is seated in the upper Heavenlies, far above all principality and power; and, now get this, the members of the Body of Christ are seated WITH Him in the upper Heavenlies; members of the Body of Christ are NOT blessed with millennium Kingdom blessings, BUT with ALL spiritual blessings in the upper Heavenlies. Ephesians 2:5-6 . Ephesians 1:3 .


In Acts 7:54-58 , the LORD Jesus Christ, is seen as the “standing” Son of man. He is not the Son of man to the Body of Christ, but in His Kingdom dealings with Israel, who Stephen was addressing in Acts 7 . Then the question that begs to be asked, “In Acts 7:54-58 , was Christ SEATED in the upper-Heavenlies as Head of the Body of Christ, as He is seen in Ephesians 1:19-22 , and as He is now? NO!


In Matthew, Mark, and Luke, there was one baptism, baptism for Israel unto repentance for the remission of sins; that was water baptism, so that Christ might be made manifest unto Israel. John 1:31 . However, in Ephesians, Philippians, and Colossians, there is one baptism; that baptism by which the believer is identified with Christ in His death, burial, resurrection and heavenly seat. THAT IS NOT WATER! In the “Book Between” there were two baptisms, water and Holy Spirit.


Why is it that true messengers of the Gospel of the Grace of God turn to the messages of the Apostle Paul for the Gospel rather than go to Matthew, Mark and Luke? It is because in those three Books we do not find the clear, unmixed Gospel of Grace, but rather Grace mixed with the Gospel of the Kingdom, which includes works. Therefore, it is better to leave the “strive to enter in”, or “he that endureth to the end shall be saved”, or “bring forth fruit meet for repentance”, or “they take the kingdom by violence”, or “if thy right hand offend you cut it off”, (because all of them were Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`’s messages to Israel), and go on to the unmixed messages of Grace in Romans 3:24-28 , Ephesians 2:8-9 , or in Titus 3:5-6 : “Being justified (declared righteous) without a cause by God’s Grace, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus”; “By grace are ye saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God: not of works, lest any man should boast”; “not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to His mercy, He saved us”.


As the Gospel of the Kingdom was a message different from Paul’s UNmixed Gospel of Grace, so did the messages of Peter and his associates, in the Book of Acts, differ from these pure Grace messages. The message of Peter on the day of Pentecost, Acts 2:38 , differed very much from Paul’s Grace of Christ Message to the Gentiles. What Gospel preacher today would preach to Gentiles the Message of Repentance and Restitution that Peter preached to Israel, according to Acts 3:19-21 ? THERE SHOULD BE NONE! (Unfortunately there are, and they are completely outside the Will of God for this Age of Grace!) Now, there was much Grace in that message. However, it was NOT the Message of Reconciliation which the Risen Christ later committed to the Apostle Paul. Peter preached to Cornelius, “In every nation he that feareth God and worketh righteousness is accepted of Him”. Acts 10:35-36 . Compare this with Titus 3:5-6 , and Ephesians 2:8-9 . What Gospel preacher of today would follow the order of Philip’s ministry in the City of Samaria, recorded in Acts 8:5-15 ? THERE SHOULD BE NONE! It is agreed by all serious students of the Word of God, who preach, and teach, the Gospel of Grace, that the order of Acts 19:3-12 , in the year 54 A.D., is NOT God’s order for today among the members of the Body of Christ.


Paul declared that he persecuted the Church of God. Galatians 1:13 . There is no Scriptural proof that that the Body of Christ began on the day of Pentecost. It was the Pentecost, or Kingdom Church of God that he persecuted, and it either began on that day or before that day. There were no Gentiles in the Church of God which Paul persecuted, except the proselytes, (those who had previously converted to Judaism) referred to in Acts 2:10 . The first company of Gentiles to be brought in was the household of Cornelius. Acts 11:18 . Up to that year, about 41 A.D., it was unlawful for the Jewish apostles to go to a Gentile. Acts 10:28 . Concerning this company of Gentiles, who were granted repentance unto life, Peter afterward said, “God made choice among us, that the Gentiles by my mouth should hear the word of the gospel and believe” Acts 15:17 . The Lord’s permission for Peter to preach to the Gentiles came with the vision of the sheet let down three times. Acts 10:8-18 .


However, in the light of the Great Commission given to the Eleven, in which they were to disciple all nations, it is difficult to understand several facts. First, why was the housetop vision necessary to authorize Peter to preach to ONE family of religious, God fearing Gentiles? Second, why was it that it was by Peter’s mouth, rather than by the mouths of all of the Eleven commissioned in Matthew 28:19-20 , that the Gentiles were to hear the word of the gospel? Third, why was it that, after Peter’s declaration in Acts 15:7 , he was instructed to confine his ministry to the circumcision? Then Peter’s name dropped from the Book of Acts and the responsibility of evangelizing the Gentiles was given exclusively to the Apostle Paul and his associates. Galatians 2:7-9 . This also leads us to ask…Why the Apostle Paul declared that the Gentiles received mercy because of Israel’s unbelief (Romans 11:30 , Romans 11:11 , and Acts 13:46 ) INSTEAD of because of the terms of the Great Commission to the eleven?


When Peter declared that God had made choice that by his mouth the Gentiles should hear the word of the gospel and believe, James added these words: “Simeon hath declared how for the first time God did visit the Gentiles, to take out of them a people for His Name.” Acts 15:13 . And the next verse: “To this agree the words of the prophets.” Or, “THIS IS THAT which was spoken by Amos.Acts 15:14-17 . Amos 9:11-15 . And even, in his Epistle to the Romans, the Apostle Paul declared Gentile salvation, during the Acts period, was in fulfillment of Isaiah’s Kingdom prophecy. Read carefully Romans 15:10-14 .


Now it is of interest to study the declaration of Simeon and James, concerning the Gentile salvation, the outgathering from the nations, in fulfillment of Amos’ prophecy, and the Gentile salvation, in fulfillment of Isaiah’s prophecy, in the light of Ephesians 3:5-6 , and Ephesians 3:9 .


In Ephesians 3:9 , the Apostle Paul declared that the RISEN Lord instructed him to proclaim the unsearchable riches of Christ among the Gentiles. The word “unsearchable” means “untraceable”, or “not to be tracked”. However, the message to which the Apostle Paul was referring in Ephesians 3:9 was somewhat different from the message to which he referred in Romans 15:10-14 , because that “Romans” message WAS traceable; it could be tracked right back to Isaiah. In Ephesians 3:6 the Apostle Paul mentioned Gentile salvation in a joint‑Body; The Gentile Joint-heirs. He declared, in Ephesians 3:5 , that this particular Gentile salvation and Position in the Body of Christ was not made known to the sons of men in other ages; in other words, “THIS IS NOT THAT” to which Peter referred in Acts 2:16 , Acts 3:19-26 , Acts 10:43 or in Acts 15:13-17 . The Mystery among the Gentiles, “Christ in you the hope of glory,” was not made known to other generations. Colossians 1:25-27 . The “Ephesians” and “Colossians” Body of Christ truth was UNKNOWN to all of Israel’s Prophets and was not the message of the Twelve to Israel before the death of Christ, or during the “Acts” period. For this reason it is called “The Mystery” or “The Secret.” The Apostle Paul received it by direct revelation. Ephesians 3:3 . Therefore, if the Church of God, which Paul persecuted, was the subject of prophecy and the Ephesians “Church which is His Body” was NOT the subject of prophecy, were they not different Churches? ABSOLUTELY! Ephesians 1:19-22 , and Ephesians 2:5-6 .


If Pentecost was the birthday of “the Church which is His Body”, then, of course, that would be the ideal Church for this age. Then the message and program of THAT Church must be considered the ideal message and program for the Church TODAY. And if that be the case, then we should join with the modern Pentecostal Assemblies in their determination to recover for 20th, and now 21st century saints and sinners, the message, program, and order of Acts 2:38 , Acts 3:19-26 , Acts 8:5-15 , and Acts 19:3-12 . HOWEVER, the fact is, that that first message and program of the Twelve is NOT God’s order for today. This is why we do not, and should not, preach Mark 16:16 or Acts 2:38 . Therefore, the Pentecost Church must not be the Body of Christ.


So, let me summarize, in closing: “The Kingdom of God is at hand.” (Mark 1:15 ), THIS IS THAT…“The Kingdom of God shall be taken from you.” (Matthew 21:43 ) THIS IS THAT…“The Kingdom of God shall be at hand.Luke 21:31 . THIS IS THAT, this Kingdom was promised by the mouth of all the holy prophets since the world began. (Luke 1:70 , Matthew 25:31-35 ) “When the day of Pentecost was fully come,” THIS IS THAT, which was spoken by “Joel.” (Acts 2:1 , and Acts 2:16 ) “Repent (Israel) and God will send Jesus Christ.” “THIS IS THAT spoken by Moses, Samuel, and all the prophets since the world began.” (Acts 3:19-25 ), “…God at the first did visit the Gentiles to take out of them a people for His nameActs 15:14 . THIS IS THAT which was spoken by Amos and others.


Then Ephesians 3:1-11 : “THIS IS NOT THAT”. In Colossians 1:24-27 , “THIS IS NOT THAT”.


Is Christ the Head of the Church which is His Body in the “Book Between”, The Book of Acts?


If so, with what chapter did this Headship begin?


Why did God permit Israel’s Jerusalem temple to stand and let them continue their religious activities and ceremonies in that temple during the years covered by the “Book Between”, the Book of Acts?


Why did He instruct Paul to become a Jew to the Jews during those years?


Why in the “Book Between”, the Book of Acts was God’s order “to the Jew first”? (Acts 3:26 , Acts 13:46 , and Acts 18:6 )


Was Israel’s house left desolate with Matthew 23:31-39 , OR, 30 years later with Acts 28:25-28 ?


The Nation was not set aside (temporarily) until Romans 11:25 , and Acts 28:28 .

So There You Have It!!

 

Comments  

 
# BrotherMark 2009-08-05 04:22
"All Premillennialists are agreed that the Kingdom of God was offered to Israel; that the Kingdom of God was taken away from Israel; "

Yes, brother it is easy to see that the Kingdom was offered to Israel and the Jews and the offer was withdrawn because of their stubborn rebellion against Christ and what he was doing.

We see where the disciples asked Jesus if He would at this time restore the Kingdom again to Israel, just before our Lord was "caught up" to heaven.

The real question after this was...Would Israel now accept Christ the messiah? The answer we see laid out in Acts over and over is a clear NO !

We see in the cursing of the fig tree, that Israel was the unfruitful fig tree. The Lord here gave Israel one more year to produce fruit, after the three years of Christ's ministry on earth. From that time to the death of Stephen, was about one year. What happens right after this of importance?

Well.... Saul/Paul is confronted
directly by Jesus on the road to Damascus....and a new revelation is presented to Saul about Grace going out to the Gentiles apart from Israel.

Later Paul had to go to Jerusalem to confront Peter and the rest of the Apostles with his new revelation. They said that Paul should take his message of Grace to the Gentiles and they would stay in Jerusalem ......

The question arises, should the Apostles have remained in Jerusalem when they were told in their Commission to go out to the world/Gentiles ?

Those who would understand what became of our Lord's "great commission" to the twelve should always associate Acts 8:1 with Acts 1:8.

When our Lord originally commissioned the eleven apostles He included instructions as a geographical order of their ministry for Him, saying: "But ye shall receive power, after the Holy Ghost is come upon you; and ye shall be witnesses unto me in JERUSALEM , and in all JUDEA, and in SAMARIA, and unto the UTTERMOST PART OF THE EARTH. Acts 1:8 This agreement with what Luke records in his Gospel as the Lord's command:..."that repentance and remission of sin should be preached in His name among all the nations, BEGINNING AT JERUSALEM, Luke 24:47. Now in the opening verses of Acts 8 we find the Jewish believers going from Jerusalem to Judea and Samaria. This has led some to conclude that this passage records progress in carrying out of the "great commission". The VERY OPPOSITE, however, is the case. They were scattered and fled (largely to to Saul persecuting them) for their lives. And the 12 Apostles, the very ones our Lord had commanded to go from Jerusalem to all the world, stayed in Jerusalem ! It is only natural, pf course, that the believers at Jerusalem should flee when the fearful persecution broke out there, but how shall we regard the conduct of the Apostles in staying there? ...What do you think?
Of course, our commission, our revelation given to Paul, as the Body of Christ, is not the same as given to the 12
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# PastorDavid 2009-08-05 05:49
Excellent Comment Brother!

And then let's never forget, "and that the Kingdom of God SHALL YET be given to Israel. They are agreed that while the Kingdom is in abeyance, the Body of Christ is being completed. They are agreed that, “All Israel shall be saved”. Romans 11:25-26. Because, "because the gifts and calling of God are without repentance. Romans 11:25-31"
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Brother Mark 2009-08-05 10:01
Amen to all that. Thank God for II Tim 2:15 When God instructs us how to make these things clear.
5 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# BrotherMark 2009-08-05 10:42
Some have attempted to use Rom 7:4-6 to show the body of Christ is the bride of Christ, Rom 7:4-6 “Therefore, my brethren, you also have become dead to the law through the body of Christ, that you may be married to another; to Him who was raised from the dead, that we should bear fruit to God. 5 For when we were in the flesh, the sinful passions which were aroused by the law were at work in our members to bear fruit to death. 6 But now we have been delivered from the law, having died to what we were held by, so that we should serve in the newness of the Spirit and not in the oldness of the letter.”, but the word married is the Greek word [genesqai to become] to another.

Another passage is 2 Co 11:2: “For I am jealous for you with godly jealousy. For I have betrothed you to one husband, that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ.” Here, Paul a member of the body of Christ betroths them to one husband. Yet Paul was a member of the body. That doesn’t make sense.

Another passage that is used uses marriage as illustration, but that doesn’t make the church the bride of Christ. Eph 5:25-32, “Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ also loved the church and gave Himself for her, 26 that He might sanctify and cleanse her with the washing of water by the word, 27 that He might present her to Himself a glorious church, not having spot or wrinkle or any such thing, but that she should be holy and without blemish. 28 So husbands ought to love their own wives as their own bodies; he who loves his wife loves himself. 29 For no one ever hated his own flesh, but nourishes and cherishes it, just as the Lord does the church. 30 For we are members of His body, of His flesh and of His bones. 31 ‘For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh.’ 32 This is a great mystery, but I speak concerning Christ and the church.”

The bride the Lamb’s wife is very closely tied to Israel. We don’t need to steal any blessings from Israel. We are already His body.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

 
Design by USDesigns